1 |
Chris Gianelloni posted <1115136614.889.281.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net>, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Tue, 03 May 2005 12:10:14 -0400: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles. |
5 |
> These would be minimal profiles not designed for actual use, but only for |
6 |
> performing a portage update for those people that lag too far behind. The |
7 |
> idea would be a very tiny profile, per arch, that is not cascaded. |
8 |
|
9 |
I like! In some cases, they may be combine-able, as well multiple archs |
10 |
to a profile, if they are sufficiently minimal. They could remain for |
11 |
some time to point people to if/as necessary. |
12 |
|
13 |
My idea for an archive was that this should be pretty low traffic, and |
14 |
would get it off the rsync mirrors and clean out the profile tree, making |
15 |
things less confusing. However, put them in a single "emergency-profile" |
16 |
subtree, and make them tiny enough, and it would do almost as well, while |
17 |
at the same time still being conveniently located in the portage tree. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
21 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
22 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
23 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |