Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 16:10:23
Message-Id: 1115136614.889.281.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:21 -0700, Duncan wrote:
2 > Is there a convenient profile archive somewhere? If not, perhaps one
3 > should be created, and at deletion from the tree, the profile dir in
4 > question is replaced with a file (or the empty dir with only that
5 > file) pointing to the archive. This archive could then keep the last
6 > workable profile snapshot around for another six months or so, or perhaps
7 > even forever, given the cost of storage now days. The pointer to it in
8 > the tree could then be removed 30 days or 6 months after the profile
9 > itself was removed, /forcing/ action on any laggards.
10
11 I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles.
12 These would be minimal profiles not designed for actual use, but only
13 for performing a portage update for those people that lag too far
14 behind. The idea would be a very tiny profile, per arch, that is not
15 cascaded.
16
17 --
18 Chris Gianelloni
19 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
20 Games - Developer
21 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles John Myers <electronerd@××××××××××.com>