Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 May 2005 18:48:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200505031449.54237.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:10 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 | > I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | afaik the only thing it'd need is a 'make.defaults' and a custom |
| 5 | 'packages' (where we'd force a newer version of portage of course) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | i dont think we even need a set, we could just do it with one ... after all, |
| 8 | we can stick bash code into make.defaults and have it do something ugly like |
| 9 | run `uname` or parse make.defaults to figure out the correct ARCH |
| 10 | -mike |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |