Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

[Dan Meltzer]

and my bad.

I am not yet awake.

It died cause of runpaths on strict, it just showed both, and I wasn't
thinking when I sent earlier email...
On 12/26/05, Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com> wrote:
> On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote:
> > > > Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in
> > > > without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even
> > > > sure.
> > > You're mixing up 'strict' with 'stricter'.
> > Well if I'm mixing up, someone moved the QA checks from stricter to strict
> > lately ;)
> > I don't run strict as I usually have modified ebuilds if I'm working on them;
> > I don't run stricter as lot of packages that fails are not mine, I usually
> > use it only when I'm testing my packages or my changes.
>
> strict is in make.defaults...
> This causes packages with executable stacks to die, and fairly
> arbitrarily imo (with portage 2.1_pre2 that is) (see bug 116611).
>
> IMUO, portage should never die when an issue of questionable merit
> comes up and features are simply those set by default.
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
> > Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
> >
> >
> >
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list