| 1 |
On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in |
| 4 |
> > > without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even |
| 5 |
> > > sure. |
| 6 |
> > You're mixing up 'strict' with 'stricter'. |
| 7 |
> Well if I'm mixing up, someone moved the QA checks from stricter to strict |
| 8 |
> lately ;) |
| 9 |
> I don't run strict as I usually have modified ebuilds if I'm working on them; |
| 10 |
> I don't run stricter as lot of packages that fails are not mine, I usually |
| 11 |
> use it only when I'm testing my packages or my changes. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
strict is in make.defaults... |
| 14 |
This causes packages with executable stacks to die, and fairly |
| 15 |
arbitrarily imo (with portage 2.1_pre2 that is) (see bug 116611). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
IMUO, portage should never die when an issue of questionable merit |
| 18 |
comes up and features are simply those set by default. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> -- |
| 23 |
> Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 24 |
> Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives