| 1 |
> On 27 Jan 2023, at 20:15, Michal Prívozník <mprivozn@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 1/27/23 20:21, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 10:51 -0800, A Schenck wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On 1/27/23 09:36, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> # Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> (2023-01-27) |
| 7 |
>>>> # GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some |
| 8 |
>>>> time. |
| 9 |
>>>> # Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust |
| 10 |
>>>> # and patches. |
| 11 |
>>>> # Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251. |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> [also eclass/gkrellm-plugin.eclass] |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>> app-admin/gkrellm |
| 16 |
>>>> x11-plugins/gkrelltop |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> The old homepage listed in the ebuild is gone but has moved[0]. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> The live ebuild has the correct upstream repository so it seems like |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> just an oversight to not update the homepage whenever that was |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> changed. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Thanks. Unfortunately, it only confirms what I've suspected: it's not |
| 27 |
>> maintained and nobody's working on a GTK+3 port [1]. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> [1] https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm/issues/1 |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Yes, sadly, Bill passed away more than a year ago: |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> https://mailproc.sbbsnet.net/list/gkrellm@××××××××××××××××××××××.com?cmd=user_listview_msg&domainid=40&list=gkrellm&msg_idx=28 |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> But are you saying that if there was a GTK-3 support, then gkrellm could |
| 37 |
> stay? |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Yes. And ideally a maintainer in Gentoo. |
Archives