1 |
On 1/27/23 20:21, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 10:51 -0800, A Schenck wrote: |
3 |
>> On 1/27/23 09:36, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
>>> # Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> (2023-01-27) |
5 |
>>> # GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some |
6 |
>>> time. |
7 |
>>> # Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust |
8 |
>>> # and patches. |
9 |
>>> # Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> [also eclass/gkrellm-plugin.eclass] |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> app-admin/gkrellm |
14 |
>>> x11-plugins/gkrelltop |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> The old homepage listed in the ebuild is gone but has moved[0]. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> The live ebuild has the correct upstream repository so it seems like |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> just an oversight to not update the homepage whenever that was |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> changed. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thanks. Unfortunately, it only confirms what I've suspected: it's not |
25 |
> maintained and nobody's working on a GTK+3 port [1]. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> [1] https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm/issues/1 |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Yes, sadly, Bill passed away more than a year ago: |
31 |
|
32 |
https://mailproc.sbbsnet.net/list/gkrellm@××××××××××××××××××××××.com?cmd=user_listview_msg&domainid=40&list=gkrellm&msg_idx=28 |
33 |
|
34 |
But are you saying that if there was a GTK-3 support, then gkrellm could |
35 |
stay? |
36 |
|
37 |
Michal |