| 1 |
On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 21:15 +0100, Michal Prívozník wrote: |
| 2 |
> But are you saying that if there was a GTK-3 support, then gkrellm could |
| 3 |
> stay? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Most importantly, it needs someone to take care of it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
An active Gentoo maintainer for these packages (or the subset that's |
| 8 |
going to stay), that actually answers bug reports etc. is an absolute |
| 9 |
must. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
GTK+3 port would be nice — it would at least prove that people really |
| 12 |
care enough to do the hard work, and that we won't be removing it soon |
| 13 |
enough again because of GTK+2 being removed (not likely anytime soon |
| 14 |
but…) or because the code no longer compiles, or… |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Michał Górny |
Archives