| 1 |
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the |
| 5 |
> tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I |
| 6 |
> would normally use even though the default package the virtual will |
| 7 |
> bring in is stable everywhere? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm thinking I can take the virtual straight to stable in this situation,, |
| 10 |
> but I want to be sure. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Nothing stable should be using the virtual at the time of commit so |
| 14 |
what's the benefit of going stable fast? Repoman should also be |
| 15 |
preventing commits straight to stable. I would stable the virtual at the |
| 16 |
same time as someone stable starts to use it (which probably means the |
| 17 |
30 day period). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Petteri |
Archives