1 |
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> You'd really want to a "which do you prefer, which can you use" |
4 |
> survey, then; You don't really want to choose the result preferred by |
5 |
> the most people, rather you want the result which is usable by the |
6 |
> most people. |
7 |
|
8 |
I tend to agree. Donnie said something in his manifesto which I think |
9 |
applies here: any of the proposed solutions is probably better than |
10 |
doing nothing. |
11 |
|
12 |
If I forget to tweak my locale and I end up with a comma as a decimal |
13 |
mark it isn't the end of the world, and neither is some output in |
14 |
metric units. I've ended up working on many a global system where |
15 |
times get reported in GMT and people put up with the inconvenience |
16 |
because they realize that any standard is better than no standard. |
17 |
|
18 |
What is the real end-user impact of any of this stuff anyway? During |
19 |
the install the thing that matters is being able to partition disks |
20 |
and compile kernels and such. I doubt that too many users will be |
21 |
dependent on installer locale settings for displaying weather reports |
22 |
or such. If they don't set locale, then it is like not setting |
23 |
localtime - you just get to live with some default. I would imagine |
24 |
that at least by having a UTF-8 locale users would be able to do |
25 |
things like set full names of users using unicode, etc. |
26 |
|
27 |
Rich |