| 1 |
On 06/17/2016 01:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> It might be better to just close the original bug, and then open a new |
| 3 |
> STABLEREQ bug on the tracker whenever we're interested in tracking |
| 4 |
> stabilization. That also serves as a reminder to the maintainer that |
| 5 |
> somebody actually wants it stabilized. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
This adds another layer of complexity and requires multiple |
| 8 |
depend/blocks specifications for a single user. I also question whether |
| 9 |
these stabilization requests would be created if the original devs |
| 10 |
aren't willing to call for stabilization themselves or leave the bug |
| 11 |
open so you have the history of the issue available for the |
| 12 |
stabilization, filtering it out based on keyword is easy to do in saved |
| 13 |
search. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 17 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 18 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives