From: | Jeremy Huddleston <jeremy@×××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | stuart@g.o | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT | ||
Date: | Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:46:21 | ||
Message-Id: | 1077993975.7937.9.camel@eradicator.outersquare.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT by Stuart Herbert |
1 | On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 02:55, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
2 | > I agree with Jason - a config file that hasn't been modified shouldn't be |
3 | > config-protected. No information is lost when the file is removed, and if a |
4 | > Gentoo user has edited the file, it'll get picked up because of the change in |
5 | > timestamp and md5sum. |
6 | |
7 | It should be left. Consider this case: |
8 | $ emerge packageA |
9 | /etc/services is modified to contain a reference for packageA |
10 | |
11 | $ emerge packageB |
12 | /etc/services is modified to contain a reference for packageB |
13 | |
14 | $ emerge unmerge packageB |
15 | say good bye to /etc/services |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT | Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |