Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremy@×××××××××××.org>
To: stuart@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:46:21
Message-Id: 1077993975.7937.9.camel@eradicator.outersquare.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT by Stuart Herbert
1 On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 02:55, Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > I agree with Jason - a config file that hasn't been modified shouldn't be
3 > config-protected. No information is lost when the file is removed, and if a
4 > Gentoo user has edited the file, it'll get picked up because of the change in
5 > timestamp and md5sum.
6
7 It should be left. Consider this case:
8 $ emerge packageA
9 /etc/services is modified to contain a reference for packageA
10
11 $ emerge packageB
12 /etc/services is modified to contain a reference for packageB
13
14 $ emerge unmerge packageB
15 say good bye to /etc/services

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmerging and CONFIG_PROTECT Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>