1 |
Alessandro Barbieri wrote: |
2 |
> > Obviously this will only be useful for packages wanting to statically link |
3 |
> > with libressl lib{crypto,ssl} |
4 |
> |
5 |
> There is an ongoing effort to remove static libraries from packages. |
6 |
|
7 |
I know, and I couldn't disagree more with that effort. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
> > but I think that's far better than removing libressl. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> No, it's not better, it's more work for the security team. |
13 |
|
14 |
The security team isn't be responsible for what people do. |
15 |
|
16 |
Flip side: The security team is also not entitled to decide what people |
17 |
can and can not do. |
18 |
|
19 |
Security is a policy and technology generally needs to avoid forcing |
20 |
policy onto humans, but enable human decisions. You can tell that I |
21 |
value choice. |
22 |
|
23 |
It's certainly a good default to use shared libraries, but it's no good at |
24 |
all to hamper legitimate functionality under a guise of security. That's a |
25 |
far too common and really diseased pattern throughout society, and it makes |
26 |
me sad that it proliferates also in Gentoo. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
//Peter |