Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Johannes Weiner <hnaz@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Pinboard of outdated ports
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:47:53
Message-Id: 20050523224751.GB5870@neurogen
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Pinboard of outdated ports by Tom Martin
1 On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Tom Martin wrote:
2 > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:11:38PM +0200, Johannes Weiner <hnaz@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
3 > > * More staff needed
4 > > Despite the autodeletion of uptodate packages there has to be
5 > > someone attending the list. Remove real spam or uptodate packages
6 > > where the targetversion is principally right but not in the correct
7 > > format, so the autodeletion doesn't match.
8 >
9 > How does it fit in with metadata.xml, and the maintainers and herds
10 > listed therein?
11
12 I don't get the context. Why metadata.xml? And why maintainers and herds
13 listed?
14
15 Confusion, hannes
16
17 --
18 Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 71st day of Discord in the YOLD 3171

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Pinboard of outdated ports Tom Martin <slarti@g.o>