1 |
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:47:51AM +0200, Johannes Weiner <hnaz@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Tom Martin wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:11:38PM +0200, Johannes Weiner <hnaz@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
> > > * More staff needed |
5 |
> > > Despite the autodeletion of uptodate packages there has to be |
6 |
> > > someone attending the list. Remove real spam or uptodate packages |
7 |
> > > where the targetversion is principally right but not in the correct |
8 |
> > > format, so the autodeletion doesn't match. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > How does it fit in with metadata.xml, and the maintainers and herds |
11 |
> > listed therein? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I don't get the context. Why metadata.xml? And why maintainers and herds |
14 |
> listed? |
15 |
|
16 |
Well, if this just creates an entry to the list with no mention of the |
17 |
email address of the maintainer, if given in metadata.xml, then it's |
18 |
pretty pointless in my opinion as no-one but the maintainer could/should |
19 |
bump software unless you've got a go-ahead from the maintainer or there |
20 |
are exceptional circumstances. |
21 |
|
22 |
My request is that when a new entry is added to the list, the software |
23 |
used checks the package's metadata.xml and includes the herd and |
24 |
maintainer on the list. If there is a maintainer specified, it sends an |
25 |
email to the maintainer. |
26 |
|
27 |
Maybe it would be better to tell maintainers to just subscribe to |
28 |
projects on freshmeat? |
29 |
|
30 |
Hope that makes sense now, |
31 |
Tom |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Tom Martin, http://dev.gentoo.org/~slarti |
35 |
AMD64, net-mail, shell-tools, vim, recruiters |
36 |
Gentoo Linux |