Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:20:22
Message-Id: 20050830172640.736f469e@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles by Francesco R
1 On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:46:20 +0200
2 Francesco R <vivo@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Never said this, I've a dual opteron running informix that can *only*
5 > run under a x86 environment.
6 > this is the profile for the main environment:
7 > make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2005.0
8 > and this one for the chroot:
9 > /chroot/ifx/etc/make.profile ->
10 > ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2004.0/
11 > They are covered from completely different keywords and profiles.
12
13 So it runs fine on amd64, but only with the 32-bit ABI.
14
15
16 > With your experience what are the pro and cons of merging different
17 > archs ?
18
19 Fewer different keywords to manage makes for easier maintenance in most
20 cases. If mips had 6 different keywords for different ABIs/endianness
21 we'd never get anything done.
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>