1 |
On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode |
3 |
> <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
5 |
>>> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: |
6 |
>>>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is |
7 |
>>>> practically useless. |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his |
10 |
>>>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you |
11 |
>>>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> Let's just remove it. |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which |
17 |
>>> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to |
18 |
>>> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be |
19 |
>>> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> If repoman supported adding a signedoffby line I'd likely use it more |
22 |
>> for commits. Still running repoman full before commit though. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I do not believe we have an requirement for adding Signed-off-by in |
25 |
> the gentoo repository. Why do you feel the need to do that? |
26 |
> |
27 |
General completeness is all |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |