1 |
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 19:42 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
3 |
> > You need to define what shell (or subset) you want to parse it. 'sh' |
4 |
> > itself varies from platform to platform. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> our standard has always ("always" is relative here; let's say "current") been |
7 |
> the bash superset of POSIX ... if a request comes up where someone wants to |
8 |
> change code because it breaks in their shell but the code in question is |
9 |
> POSIX compliant, the answer is simple: blow me |
10 |
> |
11 |
> if the request is reasonable like stop using some bashism in favor of the |
12 |
> POSIX form and the change isnt invasive, then sure we'll generally make the |
13 |
> change |
14 |
|
15 |
/me likes the direction Roy is heading with this. |
16 |
|
17 |
> -mike |
18 |
-- |
19 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
20 |
Gentoo Linux |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |