Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: modular X - 7.0 RC1
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:04:52
Message-Id: pan.2005.10.20.12.55.49.265831@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 by Simon Strandman
1 Simon Strandman posted <43575756.8060908@×××××.com>, excerpted below, on
2 Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:37:42 +0200:
3
4 > Donnie Berkholz skrev:
5 >
6 >> The first release candidate was announced roughly 12 hours ago. And
7 >> fitting the Gentoo you know as up to the minute, so far beyond the
8 >> bleeding edge that it's wearing a Band-Aid before it starts to bleed,
9 >> comes the complete package in Portage -- all 296 packages worth.
10 >
11 > Will you add a ebuild for the 6.9-RC1 release also, or will gentoo go
12 > completely for the modular tree?
13
14 Donnie mentioned some weeks/months ago here on dev, when discussing the
15 move to modular, that Gentoo would be going totally modular. It fits with
16 the way Gentoo does things, allowing folks to avoid installing what they
17 don't need, AND the 6.9 monolithic release has been announced as basically
18 the end of the monolithic line upstream, so we'd have to move to it
19 eventually in any case.
20
21 Note that even the monolithic X ebuilds have had a couple modules split
22 out, for some time, xterm's the example I remember.
23
24 That's why... if you've been following, there hasn't been anything beyond
25 the monolithic 6.8.99.15 snapshot in portage, as work had switched to
26 modular, altho .15 has had a few -rX releases.
27
28 FWIW, I tried unmasking the modular ebuilds and merging using Donnie's
29 HOWTO, as posted here earlier, but while it all compiled, something wasn't
30 right and X wouldn't launch. I never had time to track it down, tho I
31 really wanted to get it running as I've been hacking up the monolithic
32 ebuilds to remove stuff I didn't want, for some time, so the best
33 I've been able to do is run those .15 monolithic snapshots mentioned
34 earlier. (It's quite possible the issue was related to gcc4 or the masked
35 binutils and glibc I'm running in relation to that, or it could have been
36 that in combination with my arch, amd64, or... it could have been just my
37 particular installation...)
38
39 I'm currently in the middle of compiling KDE-3.5.0-beta2, which is out,
40 and will probably take a couple days to recuperate after that before
41 attempting modular-X again. However, it's a pretty safe bet I'll be
42 trying it before the end of next week!
43
44 --
45 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
46 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
47 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
48 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
49
50
51 --
52 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list