| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> it seems like some GNU projects start to release their source tarballs |
| 5 |
> in lzip compressed versions only [1][2]. |
| 6 |
> This is a problem since portage's unpack function doesn't know anything |
| 7 |
> about lzip. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What do you think? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
A short-term solution would be to add lzip support to unpacker.eclass |
| 15 |
and utilize that instead of the built-in unpack function. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
A long-term solution would be to modify PMS to support unpacking lzip archives. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Either way, you will still need to have app-arch/lzip in DEPEND, |
| 20 |
similar to app-arch/unzip. |
Archives