| 1 |
Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:13:51PM -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Imho we have to remove the partly and incompatible relicensed cdrtools-2.01.01 |
| 5 |
>>> alpha ebuilds from the tree. |
| 6 |
>> I completely agree. In fact, Fedora Development also had to revert this change |
| 7 |
>> due to the same licensing issues a couple of weeks ago. (See the thread spawned |
| 8 |
>> from the 20060817 rawhide report [1].) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> No, they had to do this because they are distributing a built binary, |
| 11 |
> same as Debian. We don't do that, so there is no issue for us[1]. See |
| 12 |
> my other response in this thread for details. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> thanks, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> greg k-h |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> [1] As long as we take the binary off the live cd and the install image. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
and the tinderbox[1.5] |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
[1.5] http://tinderbox.x86.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/x86/app-cdr/ |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives