Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d | ||
| Date: | Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:42:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200704082339.29786.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d by "Marcelo Góes" |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote: |
| 2 | > As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is |
| 3 | |
| 4 | doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d` |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > Does it make sense to allow both styles? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | not really |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | yes please |
| 13 | -mike |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d | Christian Heim <phreak@g.o> |