Archives
Archives
| From: | "Marcelo Góes" <vanquirius@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:10:51 |
| Message-Id: | 9e83288a0704082007o40b2f092mbcbe9f0ac09292fe@mail.gmail.com |
| 1 | Hello, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that |
| 4 | use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is |
| 7 | 1) cleaner and easier to read |
| 8 | 2) more portable (for systems that use something other than |
| 9 | /etc/env.d, for example) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Does it make sense to allow both styles? |
| 12 | Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Cheers, |
| 15 | Marcelo |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Marcelo Góes |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |