| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> You'd have a really long list of maintenance architectures for me. Like |
| 3 |
> I said, I don't use a single machine. The idea of *any* architecture |
| 4 |
> being my "primary" one just doesn't really fit. There's also the simple |
| 5 |
> fact that it doesn't matter *at all* what the maintainer runs it on, |
| 6 |
> only whether or not (s)he considers it stable. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
There have been many cases where I've considered a package stable on one |
| 9 |
architecture but not on another. How would I indicate this? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Thanks, |
| 12 |
Donnie |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives