| 1 |
Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 10:18 schrieb Stefan Schweizer: |
| 2 |
> Hi |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> we currently have both webdav and nowebdav ueflags, this is |
| 5 |
> confusing: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> # grep webdav /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc |
| 8 |
> dev-util/git:webdav - Adds support for push'ing to HTTP repositories |
| 9 |
> via DAV dev-util/subversion:nowebdav - Disables WebDAV support via |
| 10 |
> neon library net-misc/sitecopy:webdav - Enable WebDav (Web-based |
| 11 |
> Distributed Authoring and Versioning) support. This system allows |
| 12 |
> users to collaborate on websites using a web based interface. See |
| 13 |
> the ebuild for an FAQ page. Enables neon as well to handle webdav |
| 14 |
> support. |
| 15 |
> www-apps/open-xchange:webdav - Enable WebDav (Web-based Distributed |
| 16 |
> Authoring and Versioning) support. |
| 17 |
> www-servers/lighttpd:webdav - Enables webdev properties |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The proposed solution is to make webdav a global useflag and set it |
| 20 |
> as a default use flag to have the same effect as the current nowebdav |
| 21 |
> use flag in subversion. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
5 packages, and only one has nowebdav, and you want to make it a default |
| 24 |
USE flag? I strongly disagree here. Make it a plain useflag and notify |
| 25 |
users of subversion that the behaviour changed. Much better than |
| 26 |
informing users of the other 4 packages that the behaviour changed. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Danny |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives