| 1 |
On 7/24/13 5:53 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/24/2013 03:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:17:26 +0200 |
| 4 |
>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Other thing is that Portage explicitly ignores PMS in this matter |
| 6 |
>>> and uses dependencies from ebuilds rather than recorded ones. This is |
| 7 |
>>> supposedly wrong, supposedly slow but allows us to be lazy. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> It's not slow. It's just wrong, and intermittently leads to very |
| 10 |
>> strange behaviour. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> ++ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly, |
| 15 |
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paweł |
Archives