Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:54:41
Message-Id: CAMiTYSp72p+Rp_0JipQ71dUy9Oey89hP4tE9K--JWuc7w78dWw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes by "Paweł Hajdan
1 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2 <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote:
3 > On 7/24/13 5:53 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
4 >> On 07/24/2013 03:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:17:26 +0200
6 >>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
7 >>>> Other thing is that Portage explicitly ignores PMS in this matter
8 >>>> and uses dependencies from ebuilds rather than recorded ones. This is
9 >>>> supposedly wrong, supposedly slow but allows us to be lazy.
10 >>
11 >>> It's not slow. It's just wrong, and intermittently leads to very
12 >>> strange behaviour.
13 >>
14 >> ++
15 >
16 > Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
17 > even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
18
19 Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS="--dynamic-deps=n" in make.conf if you'd
20 like to test it.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o>