Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Craig M. Reece" <craigthulu@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/init.d
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:42:19
Message-Id: 20020311213900.GA5912@littlethulu.craigthulu.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/init.d by Bob Phan
1 On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Bob Phan spoke thusly:
2 > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Yannick Koehler wrote:
3 >
4 > > Great,
5 > >
6 > > at last, I have the answer I was looking for. I have not seen
7 > > etc-update because it's a package (gentoolkit) I didn't install because
8 > > I didn't need it.
9 >
10 > That brings up something interesting. Shouldn't gentoolkit be part of
11 > the system profile? I can't think of a single reason for someone to
12 > _not_ have it installed. etc-update and qpkg should be installed just
13 > as readily as emerge. A good 25% of the questions on this list have
14 > resulted in, "emerge gentoolkit". Any thoughts?
15 >
16
17 Perhaps a subset comprising qpkg and etc-update should be made into a
18 different package. If I recall correctly, emerge --pretend gentoolkit
19 showed that I needed a bunch of X etc dependancies (full memory
20 recall eludes me at the moment) which is not desired for a default
21 minimalist setup.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/init.d Bob Phan <bob@××××××××××××××××.net>