| 1 |
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 06:52 pm, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:32:06 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it |
| 6 |
> > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, |
| 7 |
> > as building does not depend on portage being there. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Hmm, how do you build an ebuild without portage? Not trying to defend |
| 10 |
> that dependency, but technically all ebuilds DEPEND on portage (or a |
| 11 |
> compatible package manager), that's the most implicit dependency of all. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
i assume you didnt read the reply i made already ... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
gcc-config DEPEND-ed on a specific version of portage (the first one to |
| 16 |
provide portageq to userspace) |
| 17 |
-mike |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives