| 1 |
Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 2 |
> The fonts license seems to be the same as licenses/BitstreamVera which |
| 3 |
> is in-tree. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
One of them, yes. But the two others fonts license are more difficult to |
| 6 |
get. |
| 7 |
> As for the songs, does it make sense to put that in a separate package |
| 8 |
> that the code package depends on? The package can have the restrictive |
| 9 |
> license it is distributed under and RESTRICT="mirror bindist". |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
Yes, I can do a fretsonfire package and a fretsonfire-data package like |
| 12 |
nwn. It makes sense for licensing but it will force us to mirror |
| 13 |
self-splitted packages. |
| 14 |
But even if doing that, what will be the LICENSE for fretsonfire-data ? |
| 15 |
"Distribution, modification or commercial usage of the songs is not |
| 16 |
allowed" is not really a license ;) (and I will have to add the 3 fonts |
| 17 |
license with 2 unknown) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
By the way, I have contacted upstream about this issue and I didn't get |
| 20 |
any answer. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
For information, copying file is here : |
| 23 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~volkmar/fretsonfire_copying.txt |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Mounir |
Archives