| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:47:17 -0700 Donnie Berkholz |
| 6 |
> <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> | Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 8 |
> | > I just read this: http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1055 and |
| 9 |
> | > think it explains things very well. |
| 10 |
> | |
| 11 |
> | I blogged [1] about this the other day. It also talks a bit about |
| 12 |
> | bounties, which I was actually more interested in. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Which would be even worse, since you'd end up getting cash offered for |
| 15 |
> silly version bumps and package adds and nothing at all for critical |
| 16 |
> stuff that the end user doesn't tend to see. Unlike KDE, we have |
| 17 |
> multiple 'layers' -- we're not just working on directly user visible |
| 18 |
> applications. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My idea was that the foundation would foot the bounties. It sounds as if |
| 21 |
you think the users would. |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iD8DBQFCiVS4XVaO67S1rtsRAnGlAKDrKoEFkfanyg9vewO1vRQ2ynuUbgCgqANv |
| 26 |
8E4AnG7wuD8OI6tnSdizBc0= |
| 27 |
=YW5+ |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives