Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | ||
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jan 2014 01:11:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 52D5E03C.3010900@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Tom Wijsman |
||
| 1 | On 01/14/2014 08:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > This is under the assumption that the user knows of the state of the |
| 4 | > stabilization worsening; if the user is unaware of that change, the |
| 5 | > "could have done anyway" might be less common and first something bad |
| 6 | > would need to happen before they realize the worsened stabilization. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | If I don't realize it, it ain't broke. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |