Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox?
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:36:35
Message-Id: 29f49223-d227-888c-4048-0a333704124a@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox? by William Hubbs
1 On 09/05/18 20:31, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 07:54:16PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
3 >> ^ That is relatively common knowledge .. my question was more steered
4 >> towards whether Eudev is carrying this feature through as well (which
5 >> likely as they might ... ) I believe eudev was voted to become the
6 >> default implementation for Gentoo, to complement openRC as it was
7 >> becoming impossible to maintain udev-standalone separate from systemd.
8 > Well, it is not impossible to maintain udev standalone, we are still
9 > doing it just fine, so if that is the reason eudev was made the default,
10 > we need to revisit that. Not in this thread, however.
11 >
12 > William
13 Probably over-simplified there a little.
14
15 Still, I think we've run round one loop, and still not learnt much new...
16 *fakes surprise*

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature