| 1 |
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 07:54:16PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/05/18 19:50, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:12:32 +0100 |
| 4 |
> > "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> It's worth noting that the default rules shipped with udev assign mode |
| 8 |
> >>> 0666 to the /dev/dri/renderD* device nodes. So, outside of a sanbox |
| 9 |
> >>> environment, any user may access these devices. |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> This was merged as part of this PR: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/7112 |
| 12 |
> >>> |
| 13 |
> >> How does that pan out for other init systems? |
| 14 |
> > udev |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Which practically everyone uses regardless of init system. Even openrc users. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Upstream, udev is part of systemd now. |
| 19 |
> ^ That is relatively common knowledge .. my question was more steered |
| 20 |
> towards whether Eudev is carrying this feature through as well (which |
| 21 |
> likely as they might ... ) I believe eudev was voted to become the |
| 22 |
> default implementation for Gentoo, to complement openRC as it was |
| 23 |
> becoming impossible to maintain udev-standalone separate from systemd. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Well, it is not impossible to maintain udev standalone, we are still |
| 26 |
doing it just fine, so if that is the reason eudev was made the default, |
| 27 |
we need to revisit that. Not in this thread, however. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
William |
Archives