| 1 |
On Dec 9, 2007 9:21 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15:49 Sat 08 Dec , Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hello, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I want to make gnupg-2 stable. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > The problem is that gnupg-1.9 was slotted as slot "1.9" and made stable. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > So now we have two slots, slot "0" and slot "1.9". |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > gnupg-2 is drop-in replacement of gnupg-1, so eventually no slotting |
| 12 |
> > should be used. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > As far as I see, there are two migration pathes I can use: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > 1. Mark gnupg-2 stable, as it blocks older versions, this results in |
| 17 |
> > forcing users to manually unmerge the gnugp-1.9 series, this is the |
| 18 |
> > quickest and simplest migration path. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Seems reasonable. Any particular reason to slot gnupg-2 as SLOT 0 rather |
| 21 |
> than SLOT 1.9? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
he end result would be one slot... If I need to chose 1.9 or 0, I prefer the |
| 24 |
standard is to have slot 0. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> > 2. Perform slot-move of slot "0" and slot "1.9" into slot "2", so |
| 27 |
> > migration will be smooth. The problem is that I need all archs to work |
| 28 |
> > with me in timely manner so that this will be possible. I have |
| 29 |
> > bug#194113 waiting for arm, mips, s390, sh, and this only for the |
| 30 |
> > dependencies. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> I can imagine this resulting in very weird issues, when you have two of |
| 33 |
> the same package installed in the same slot. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
What? |
| 36 |
These are two versions.... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
If nobody else address this, I will chose the easy way -> option#0. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Best Regards, |
| 41 |
Alon Bar-Lev. |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives