1 |
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:52:46 -0400 |
2 |
NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 06/10/2016 09:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:19:43 -0400 |
6 |
> > NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> # Ensure availibility of xz-utils on old EAPIs |
9 |
> >> if [[ "${EAPI:-0}" -lt "6" ]]; then |
10 |
> >> DEPEND="app-arch/xz-utils" |
11 |
> >> fi |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > One more thing. What is the rationale for this? I've tried hard, and I |
14 |
> > can't find anything EAPI-conditional about dependency on xz-utils. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There was a light discussion last time I posted this which resulted in |
18 |
> the suggestion that it be included with EAPI 5. There were a lot of |
19 |
> mixed opinions, and a lot of doubts one way or the other. Should be |
20 |
> moot now though, as I think I'm going to follow through on perfinion's |
21 |
> suggestion starting with EAPI 6 only. |
22 |
|
23 |
Just to be clear, xz-utils situation is the same in all EAPIs. if you |
24 |
want to be a good person, explicitly depend on it. But it's not |
25 |
strictly necessary anymore since someone added it to @system out of |
26 |
laziness. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |
31 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |