| 1 |
On 06/10/2016 09:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:19:43 -0400 |
| 3 |
> NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> # Ensure availibility of xz-utils on old EAPIs |
| 6 |
>> if [[ "${EAPI:-0}" -lt "6" ]]; then |
| 7 |
>> DEPEND="app-arch/xz-utils" |
| 8 |
>> fi |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> One more thing. What is the rationale for this? I've tried hard, and I |
| 11 |
> can't find anything EAPI-conditional about dependency on xz-utils. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
There was a light discussion last time I posted this which resulted in |
| 15 |
the suggestion that it be included with EAPI 5. There were a lot of |
| 16 |
mixed opinions, and a lot of doubts one way or the other. Should be |
| 17 |
moot now though, as I think I'm going to follow through on perfinion's |
| 18 |
suggestion starting with EAPI 6 only. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives