1 |
On Wed, 15 May 2013 17:03:13 +0200 |
2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 05/15/2013 03:41 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
5 |
> > ... GNOME ... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> And given that the end-plan according to the guys is to kill the |
8 |
> distributions shall we just close Gentoo now? |
9 |
|
10 |
Let's not exaggerate things, there are a ton of other DEs out there; |
11 |
are all of them starting to depend on systemd specific features? |
12 |
|
13 |
> > And (and!) how does all this fit together with eudev? If the idea is |
14 |
> > to either put logind in udev (thus, not creating a separate logind |
15 |
> > ebuild), it means that eudev is already a dead end for GNOME users, |
16 |
> > unless the eudev team is going to provide logind as well. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Is that so incredibly terrible write and maintain 1k loc? |
19 |
|
20 |
Whether or not it is terrible, it is a time sink; is it worth doing it? |
21 |
|
22 |
> > I don't want to start a flamewar here, I was the one who called |
23 |
> > Lennart software lennartware, but science is science, and a reality |
24 |
> > check had to be done: at some near point in the future, our users |
25 |
> > will be forced to replace udev/eudev with systemd. Like it. Or not. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Science is science, systemd doesn't work with anything but linux, |
28 |
> Gentoo in theory should care about not-linux. |
29 |
|
30 |
Indeed, the goal here is solely to make "systemd more accessible"; we |
31 |
shouldn't pursue it to be the main init system or force it upon users, |
32 |
unless there are indicators in the future that it became better (eg. |
33 |
supports BSD, ...) for everyone. |
34 |
|
35 |
Whether upstreams will force users remains to be a question to me, this |
36 |
thread indicates a view from the GNOME users side; but that does not |
37 |
target the wide audience that uses other DEs. |
38 |
|
39 |
> > Is there anything we can do? Besides "being prepared", I don't |
40 |
> > think so. Do we control upstreams? No, sorry. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> I'm upstream for some stuff, vlc was already really close to |
43 |
> force-kill pulseaudio because of some cute problems, the thing got |
44 |
> otherwise fixed. |
45 |
|
46 |
Patches are still an option, and if patches become to tedious there |
47 |
is the possibility to fork in the worst caste; if there aren't either |
48 |
of those, we probably don't care enough to provide that piece of |
49 |
software to our users. There's a moment one has to stop caring about |
50 |
certain broken / incompatible pieces of software and throw them out. |
51 |
|
52 |
> Freebsd, openbsd and some other operating systems are still there, |
53 |
> they have their reasons and usually work better in those fields than |
54 |
> other, I'm sure some people would wish to kill them, not going to |
55 |
> happen anytime soon. |
56 |
|
57 |
It's better to be neutral than to pursue something you can't accomplish. |
58 |
|
59 |
> > So what do we want to do then? Isolate from the rest of the world? |
60 |
> |
61 |
> The world is bigger than that and we were making bridges around, *why* |
62 |
> severing them because somebody else decided for you? |
63 |
|
64 |
Indeed, I'd rather embrace than isolate; if something is useful for a |
65 |
large share of users, isolating us from it won't make anybody happy. |
66 |
|
67 |
> > (It's not a sarcastic question). I hope that everybody does their |
68 |
> > own reality check. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> Did mine, other experienced the hard way what I said many times. |
71 |
> |
72 |
> Gnome doesn't seem a good reason to leave in the cold people that do |
73 |
> not even care about it. |
74 |
|
75 |
Used GNOME for months, then with 3.6 - 3.8 it started to break on me; |
76 |
it didn't work on either OpenRC or systemd. While I was a happy user at |
77 |
first, recent events made me lose interest in it; I think a discussion |
78 |
regarding init systems and similar software shouldn't be focused on a |
79 |
single DE, so I too am not sure why focus is laid on GNOME here... |
80 |
|
81 |
-- |
82 |
With kind regards, |
83 |
|
84 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
85 |
Gentoo Developer |
86 |
|
87 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
88 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
89 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |