| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 11:07, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, this crap is definitely not gentoo-dev material. If everone sent |
| 3 |
> email to gentoo-dev complaining that something wasn't keyworded, the |
| 4 |
> list would be flooded. The proper method of getting something keyworded |
| 5 |
> is filing a bug or poking an arch maintainer on irc. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Did we ever officially set up the x86 arch team, or is that not going to |
| 8 |
> be done? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
shrug on the official thing but jeeves and myself have been chillin on |
| 11 |
#gentoo-x86 for the past few unknown time frames. Everything I use |
| 12 |
Gentoo for in production is i[3-6]86-pc-*-linux so I'm willing to deal |
| 13 |
with x86 only issues there. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Steve |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Antonio Coralles wrote: |
| 19 |
> > is there any specific reason why gtkmm-2.4.7 is not in ~x86 ? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > -- |
| 23 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded) Developer |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives