Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o>
To: Antonio Coralles <noche.suapie@××××××.at>
Cc: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:07:11
Message-Id: 41A9F7A4.9060101@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 by Antonio Coralles
1 Ok, this crap is definitely not gentoo-dev material. If everone sent
2 email to gentoo-dev complaining that something wasn't keyworded, the
3 list would be flooded. The proper method of getting something keyworded
4 is filing a bug or poking an arch maintainer on irc.
5
6 Did we ever officially set up the x86 arch team, or is that not going to
7 be done?
8
9 Steve
10
11 Antonio Coralles wrote:
12 > is there any specific reason why gtkmm-2.4.7 is not in ~x86 ?
13 >
14 >
15 > --
16 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
17 >
18 >
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 foser <foser@g.o>