Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 | ||
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:08:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1101679690.30392.4.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 by "Stephen P. Becker" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 11:07 -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 | > Did we ever officially set up the x86 arch team, or is that not going to |
| 3 | > be done? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Again the arch team, as long as maintainership for packages is on x86 |
| 6 | arch, such a team shouldn't touch packages. Maintainers stabilize first, |
| 7 | only then arches. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Too bad the last discussion on this issue remained in limbo, we should |
| 10 | try and get some consensus going here on how to deal with this. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] gtkmm-2.4.7 | "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> |