| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:28:40 -0400
|
| 5 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> >> - - the new DEPEND now will be used for things that are |
| 7 |
> >> *currently* in RDEPEND and DEPEND (so that things will work) but |
| 8 |
> >> are not actually run-time dependencies. Said atoms will then be |
| 9 |
> >> removed from RDEPEND (and not be included in the new HDEPEND |
| 10 |
> >> either) as they aren't really supposed to be there in the first |
| 11 |
> >> place. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I'm not entirely sure that there are more than a handful of very |
| 14 |
> > special cases that would be covered by the second point. Can |
| 15 |
> > anyone provide examples? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Bug 263343 , the 'fontconfig' dep for some package i wasn't able to |
| 18 |
> find easily |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Do we have an explanation as to *why* fontconfig has to be on ROOT
|
| 21 |
here? Is it because $ROOT/var/cache/fontconfig needs to exist at build
|
| 22 |
time, but not at runtime? If so, is this better fixed by using a
|
| 23 |
temporary directory?
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Bug 317337 (original HDEPEND proposal) mentions the |
| 26 |
> x11-proto/xcb-proto dep for libxcb (and i assume anything else |
| 27 |
> depending on xcb-proto) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
That's a BADEPEND.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- --
|
| 32 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlBKW7cACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG0iQCfdYgzb5kFYE/fN6iTAEJriyuR
|
| 37 |
zxwAoJi0PvK7JZVqaltliyJFlCZARQRj
|
| 38 |
=Tzgv
|
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives