| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/09/12 04:14 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:08:53 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius |
| 6 |
> <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Bringing it back to the issue it's solving: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> Afaict, for migration: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> - - DEPEND changes to HDEPEND |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If we're going by Chromium, AFAICS they're only making this change |
| 14 |
> when they find they actually need it to get the resolver to give |
| 15 |
> "the right answer", and otherwise leaving DEPEND as-is. This |
| 16 |
> strikes me as being heavily in Doing It Wrong territory. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>> - - the new DEPEND now will be used for things that are |
| 19 |
>> *currently* in RDEPEND and DEPEND (so that things will work) but |
| 20 |
>> are not actually run-time dependencies. Said atoms will then be |
| 21 |
>> removed from RDEPEND (and not be included in the new HDEPEND |
| 22 |
>> either) as they aren't really supposed to be there in the first |
| 23 |
>> place. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I'm not entirely sure that there are more than a handful of very |
| 26 |
> special cases that would be covered by the second point. Can |
| 27 |
> anyone provide examples? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Bug 263343 , the 'fontconfig' dep for some package i wasn't able to |
| 31 |
find easily |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Bug 317337 (original HDEPEND proposal) mentions the |
| 34 |
x11-proto/xcb-proto dep for libxcb (and i assume anything else |
| 35 |
depending on xcb-proto) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlBKWPgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDUFQEAhOF99mIqr/TXTOGFgdBdARg3 |
| 41 |
RSPlU8GQpxyEP2x9GPoA/07BSSTfoObc8COCTlpiC+RQP4zbUMwWODazNCszi/hx |
| 42 |
=BMvQ |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives