| 1 |
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 09:40:01 +0100 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I was also wondering about what we prefer if Michal's suggestion is not |
| 5 |
> possible: |
| 6 |
> - Build support for other langs by default -> More time when we need to |
| 7 |
> emerge gcc or update it but less time as we don't need to rebuild for |
| 8 |
> that (I remember when I needed to build pdftk and needed to wait for a |
| 9 |
> gcc rebuild giving gcj support) |
| 10 |
> - Build support for other langs disabled by default -> Well, does it |
| 11 |
> save so much time to compensate the rebuilds we would need to do in the |
| 12 |
> future when we need to emerge some package some time? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I think for most people the number of times they've upgraded gcc far outweighs |
| 15 |
the number of times they've had to rebuild it to install a fortran package. |
| 16 |
We should optimize for the common case. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk |
| 21 |
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 |
Archives