| 1 |
On 05/01/04 Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> writes: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > ps. Besides this I feel the need to allow per-ebuild descriptions on |
| 6 |
> > useflags. Those descriptions would describe what the consequences of |
| 7 |
> > the useflags are. Like for subversion the berkdb useflag signifies |
| 8 |
> > whether the server part gets build (because berkdb is needed for |
| 9 |
> > that), it would be very usefull to have some easilly accessible |
| 10 |
> > description for it. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> In this case, a "server" use flag would be more appropriate. It is |
| 13 |
> the same reason that the X use flag should control whether x-chat |
| 14 |
> builds with X support or text support, rather than the gtk use flag. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I agree on the "server" USE flag, too bad my last attempt at it got a |
| 17 |
lot of oppositions. Maybe it's different now (as we have package.use), I |
| 18 |
don't know. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Marius |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 26 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives