1 |
On 12/10/17 22:24, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
2 |
> hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit |
5 |
> which is a lagging behind upstream. |
6 |
> However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always |
7 |
> install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> In 2017 I don't see much value in maintaining a fork from a package |
10 |
> (rpm) that weight less than 3MB when the functionality we need is |
11 |
> already all upstreamed. But if there is someone willing to keep it up to |
12 |
> date, that's totally fine. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Provided we^W you keep dev-util/debugedit indefinitely it's possible to |
15 |
> provide more useful choices to the users with at least two courses of |
16 |
> action: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> 1) instruct ${package_manager} to search for `debugedit` first in |
19 |
> ${PATH} _and_ then in /usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit. |
20 |
> This way dev-util/debugedit take precedence, if it's not installed and |
21 |
> app-arch/rpm is, then the latter will be used. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 2) optionally (via useflag) create a symlink in /usr/bin to the libexec |
24 |
> debugedit when installing rpm. Obviously the two package must block each |
25 |
> other. |
26 |
> the rpm package implementing this solution (revbumped to latest) is |
27 |
> available here: |
28 |
> https://github.com/vivo75/vivovl/blob/master/app-arch/rpm/rpm-4.14.0.ebuild |
29 |
> |
30 |
> thanks for reading and please share your thoughts |
31 |
> |
32 |
> -- Francesco (vivo) Riosa |
33 |
> |
34 |
Sounds to me like a potential case of a 'virtual/debugedit' package, |
35 |
depending on one of rpm or debugedit to be installed, perhaps? |
36 |
|
37 |
MJE |