| 1 |
On 22/07/14 11:21, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/22/2014 07:52 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy to |
| 4 |
>> apply a patch that does this with the information I have today. |
| 5 |
> What a great way to kill the distro. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I can already heat my house with the number of unnecessary rebuilds - I |
| 8 |
> can't imagine how many people will be left once we have to needlessly |
| 9 |
> rebuild libreoffice and half the tree every time someone makes some |
| 10 |
> minor change. If developers can't revbump correctly to address the |
| 11 |
> shortcomings of dynamic deps, why do we expect they will be able to do |
| 12 |
> so for static deps? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> When can we expect this issue to be brought before the Council? I look |
| 15 |
> forward to seeing the specific examples of unavoidable breakage that |
| 16 |
> would be required to make such a decision. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+1 |
Archives