Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:21:42
Message-Id: 19541.166.70.55.210.1177442155.squirrel@wonkabar.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Danny van Dyk
1 > Hi all,
2 >
3 > [CC'ing council@g.o as requested by GLEP amendment from March 8th, 2007]
4 >
5 > A subset of council members decided today that multiple version suffixes
6 > are illegal in the tree pending further notice. This decission can be
7 > appealed at the next Council meeting. If there is sufficient public
8 > demand, an earlier meeting can be held.
9 >
10 > This decission has been made to prevent sufficient precedence for
11 > unilateral changes to the tree structure. So far the following package
12 > versions are considered illegal:
13 >
14 > media-viode/mplayer-1.0_rc2_pre20070321-r4
15 > media-video/transcode-1.0.3_rc2_p20070310-r1
16
17 MPlayer needs to be fixed, though it's in the same boat as transcode ...
18 it's a release candidate plus a patch level.
19
20 Multimedia apps are infamous for rarely having releases, so we are stuck
21 with SVN snapshots.
22
23 What we really need is a suffix for RCS systems, since that's what they
24 really are.
25
26 However, if anyone has any suggestions for naming schemes in the meantime,
27 I'm all ears.
28
29 Steve
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies