Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:34:25
Message-Id: 20070424193148.GO7810@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Steve Dibb
1 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:15:55PM -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
2 > > media-viode/mplayer-1.0_rc2_pre20070321-r4
3 > > media-video/transcode-1.0.3_rc2_p20070310-r1
4 > MPlayer needs to be fixed, though it's in the same boat as transcode ...
5 > it's a release candidate plus a patch level.
6 >
7 > Multimedia apps are infamous for rarely having releases, so we are stuck
8 > with SVN snapshots.
9 >
10 > What we really need is a suffix for RCS systems, since that's what they
11 > really are.
12 >
13 > However, if anyone has any suggestions for naming schemes in the meantime,
14 > I'm all ears.
15 I was one of the council members to weigh in on this, and the quick
16 improvement that I came up with, was going for a naming scheme like so:
17
18 printf "_rc%d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR,$MONTH,$DAY
19
20 Set the date portions to zero in other builds.
21
22 Alternatively, follow the example of any ebuild that uses a dated
23 patchset, and just have the date of the patchset in the ebuild, and only
24 increment $PR singly.
25
26 --
27 Robin Hugh Johnson
28 Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
29 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
30 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>