From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | ||
Date: | Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:54:05 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070425085118.7d6948ba@snowflake | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by "Robin H. Johnson" |
1 | On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:31:48 -0700 |
2 | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > printf "_rc%d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR,$MONTH,$DAY |
4 | |
5 | Funnily enough... If we're going by PMS drafts, that's illegal whereas |
6 | multiple suffixes are legal. PMS permits multiple suffixes, but limits |
7 | any individual version component to eight digits to avoid problems with |
8 | integer overflows, floating point precision etc. |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |